Hitler was a closet catholic and Darwin a closet racist: please, for f#$%ks’ sake, read the literature

O f all the nonsense and ranting  circulating regarding the Popes’ visit to UK, one surges on its own merit. The question whether Hitler was a catholic and whether Nazism is a catholic (christian) based  or related nightmare . This question has arisen due to the Pope’s recrimination of atheists, which of course let all the dogs loose across the pond (the british and americans funky way of naming the Atlantic). Hitler was a madman, and whatever he ever said or did should be contemplated in this respect. On a parallel universe,, a comment on Darwins’ view of ethnicities, in the Huffpost, has been a thing of contention since my school days. Clearly Darwin was anti-slavery, but his viewsregarding people of color (sic) is a spinier subject. All I can say, people has become so quick to scandalizewith their unfactual comments. Read the literature for f@#@$ks sake !!!!(whatever that means). Furthermore, there is a reflection on D’Souza deranged new book  about Barack Huseein at  Slate, which is one of the startling examples of misrepresentations this weekend. Add the opinionator NYT piece on getting rid of all carnivorous species and will have one of the craziest unfactual days of this year (please add O’Donells dabble of witchcraft, crazy chick). Oh dont forget NOT to pray for Mr Hitchens: I hope it helps him. (I mean NOT to pray). He is not well I understand so  let the Origin follow its course and  I will NOT pray for him……..I wish I could. Get well Mr Hitchens.

El papa…rararara

The title of this post is the punch line of a phenomenal joke: papa is a quechua word for potatoe and rararrara is the onamatopyeic of hurrah ( in spanish). People in the joke speak of the Pope unkowingly as a potato., so forth ( I forgot the joke’s script though). in any case, everyone is foaming for or against the Pope in Britain. Unless the anti-papa protests get big, the Pope has TKO the “atheists” ( why are atheists a “movement”, about what anyways? : I dont see an atheist solution to increased rates of poverty here). He beat them to the punch in particular due to the tepidity of atheist actions. I scanned the british press this morning: the Pope won. 5 to 1. In response to some friends; I DONT like this Pope, when he was elected there were many strong, unequivocal statements made mostly in the “Third World (sic) (according to the First World”) regarding the popes’ political stance, which sucks and it is inmoral and to which I dont adhere.  We have a leg to stand on. Im talking six years at least, ago. But wasnt even dreaming having a blog

More on temps perdu

More of the all-out war. Have you watched Rand Paul (Rand ??? as in Aynn or as in Rand Co.?) on tv? Or Quayle’s son?,  O’Donnell? (of unfactual masturbating ). They are in the news all the time. Dinesh D’Souza precis of his book where he explains to us why Barack is what he is. I mean Barack…it is quite surreal. And horrifying. This country has a love for charlatans: Gingrich, Ron Paul, Perot, D’Souza, Chopra, Limbaugh, Huckabee, Beck and some strident scientists. Ill bet two pisco sours that for any of them, 30 % of any poll loves them.   The same widespread ambience of, misery and outright lying  also mirrored in some science-and atheists- blogs (mostly evolution blogs): screaming at each other about the origin (if any) of the universe, the origin of time, the power, or not, of natural selection, dualism, enfin, battling over any issue. Rather than holding conversations, dialogues, about stuff. The american people is sick and tired of……themselves. But they dont know it (have you heard but you momma dont know it?? And blame the Other. And pontificate about knowledge.